|
| i |
|
|
|
|
|
i |
Order from a UK shop |
|
|
|
|
|
i |
The Author |
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
m
|
|
mmmmOut Now!!!mmmm Click on image to view book info 
|
|
|
|
What is Wrong with Black People?
mHow Post-slave Psychology and Afrocentricitym mmare joining with Colonialism to underminemmm Black Africa's Cultural Integrity
Lulu Publications, USA, 2007 |
|
|
|
Third Mind Book Excerpts
Excerpt 1 - Chapter 1 - [Montesquieu's Hypothesis] - (pp. 10-12):
[...]
The late Roland Ongomou Oyogo, a young student in law, had already been inspired by Montesquieu's approach and also by many more historical facts that forced him to think of drafting an article that he intended to get published in an academic magazine. His article was looking to establish the foundations of what he called 'a racial stratification on earth' taking into account the different levels of advancement of different continents of the world. He even convinced me to work with him on the article. His first chapter was a vague incrimination of divine injustice. Roland's wrathful words flared up against a god that might have created some races with a more subtle brain than others. But this could only be a spurious accusation with no consistent basis for scientific demonstration. I had to suggest the dismissal of the entire chapter.
Then, nature. Out of God's control, nature could be a causative factor for some races to fail developing powerful brain cells. And, probably, one of these negative elements could be climatological variation. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche had come up, prior to Roland, with a similar reflection at the time he was at odds with his mother culture-the Deutsch culture-for failing to establish civilisational power in the Western world (Adolph Hitler himself fell in love with and was almost brainwashed by Nietzsche's philosophy about Germany to the point of forcing himself to force the German people to prove how powerful the Deutsch civilisation could be in the world, with such colossal architectural plans and aggressive military campaigns-because this is, indeed, what characterises great civilisations. Hitler was convinced that this was the only way to revert the German civilisational mediocrity as criticised by Nietzsche. Little wonder if we find very much of Nietzsche's words in almost every single one of Hitler's speeches). For example, Nietzsche wrote: 'Most closely related to the question of nutriment is the question of place and climate... a never so infinitesimal sluggishness of the intestines grown into a bad habit completely suffices to transform a genius into something mediocre, something German. The German climate alone is enough to discourage strong and even heroic intestines. [...] Make a list of the places where are and have been gifted men, where wit, refinement, malice are part of happiness, where genius has almost necessarily made its home: they all possess an excellent dry air. Paris , Provence , Florence , Jerusalem , Athens-these names prove something: that genius is conditioned by dry air and clear sky' (Nietzsche, 1889).
Roland and I, too, seemed, at some point, to be getting trapped into that climatological maze in order to make sense of the African Negro's state of mediocrity as observable throughout history. And in accusation against nature, we were more focused on the most obvious as far as Black Africa was concerned: the possible disadvantageous effects of strong solar rays on the human brain. We seemed to grow more and more convinced that cold weather could certainly be the basis of the civilisational strengths of the Western and Asian worlds.
That same argument of the possible negative effects of the tropical heat has, indeed, tempted many more people to draw dramatic conclusions about the situation of Black Africa. For example, Alexandre Biyidi-a Fanghish novelist from the present Cameroon, mostly known under the pseudonyms of Eza Boto and Mongo Beti-tried to ventilate the same sort of perception when he published Trop de soleil tue l'amour in 1998, or 'too much sun kills love'. But we soon found that such a vision would be utterly paradoxical in the light of the realities of the European world where people living in a numbing cold weather are often so excited about the advent of the Summer which, for them, is the perfect period of the year for honeymoons and romantic encounters in a burning sun.
I must say that my long-time friendship with Roland, back from high school, was historical. We had this passion to try and find a way out of anything that could be intellectually disturbing enough to cause a relentless worry. Any philosophical or scientific situation to which we could be confronted was an explosive spark into an infinite search for a sensible, sound solution. We had this obsession to fabricate things, very stupid things at times, to try and palliate our preoccupations. Even mathematical formulae were invented to find a way round difficult equations.
So, when the problem of the backwardness of the Negro began to worry us, we did not know where to start. But to suppose that the tropical heat could be responsible for the civilisational slant of Black Africa could really lead us nowhere, even though there could be some prolific arguments on the advantages and drawbacks of climatological variation. Because, when taking a close looking at Australia or South Africa , we soon realised that they were almost as hot as tropical Africa . And yet, the English, once settled in these places, had been able to surpass the same sort of natural conditions to create there some sensibly advanced societies. This path too was completely stalled. However, Montesquieu's moral hypothesis remained valid. How could we suppose that the Negro African type of species could fit into true self-conscious manhood whilst failing so dramatically to observe the stereotypes of manhood?
Excerpt 2 - Chapter 2 - [Washington's battle] - (pp. 27-31):
[...]
This is why Washington's work appeared extremely noble to me, compared to the artificial forcings of those, like William Trotter, Kelly Miller, William Du Bois and, later, the wave of the activists of the 1950s and the 1960s such as Malcolm Little and Martin Luther King, who rather chose the option of social agitation, seeking rights that did not fit most of the Negroes.
If America proved to be a place where a cowboy was more respected than a prophet, it would be more appropriate to become a cowboy to deserve the respect of the American society, and especially, to equal other cowboys in order to stop undergoing their dominance.
Dr Du Bois-one of Washington's most sworn enemies who accused him of being the traitor of the Negro by trying to expose his weaknesses-also came to make sense of this principle 30 years after Washington's own death, when he said during a conference that he gave at Boston university in 1956: 'Oh Washington!' he exclaimed. ' Washington was a politician! Washington was the man who understood that America was not a temple where to preach morals, but an arena where to fight for dominance. In fact, Washington had no faith in white people. He just knew how to listen to them.' This noteworthy speech was reproduced by John Hope Franklin and August Meier in Black Leaders of the Twentieth Century (1982).
Of course, Washington knew how to listen to white people. However, my own perception is rather, as I put it in my thesis, that Washington did actually not listen to white people. He knew how to listen to a universal call for human survival, advancement and affirmation. In his own case, it was the call for the Negro to be affirmative in order to have a place in America that Washington was listening to. Ralph Ellison himself put it this way in The Invisible Man (1952): 'Unless you belong to the great American tradition of thinker-tinkers, you will not be kin to Ford, Edison and Franklin.' This is, you cannot be a true human being in the image of these three figures that stand as the symbols of the economic, scientific and political excellence of the American civilisation as long as you are incapable of imitating their qualities and abilities. Unless you are like Ford, Edison and Franklin, you will not be a man in America , you will not be part of the American dream: a dream of excellence, success and dominance.
This is surely where one may find the ultimate connection between my study of Washington 's philosophy and work on the one hand, and my debate on the place of the African Negro on the other hand. This is even why I wrote in my thesis, in connection to the contemporary African Negro's place in this world, that, 'if the world were reduced to one single country, the African Negro would find himself in the same situation as the American Negro, at least during Washington's era: incapable of adapting himself to the demands of the world's standard civilised mode of existence-a world marked by excellence, success and dominance. And for this reason, his legitimacy as a true self-conscious citizen of the world would not have any real prospect. He would, therefore, be despised, discriminated and brutalised: left in oblivion as a second class citizen of the world.
Of course, this is his actual condition in the world today. And the main reason that stands behind this condition is civilisational deficiency : his inability to be excellent, successful and dominant in some area of human endeavour; his inability to follow the stereotypes of today's world.
This is how Washington helped me begin to understand the basic reasons for the African Negro's inferior condition in the world today.
I remind myself of Patrick Ndong, a friend of mine from university, who was once presenting his Master's thesis in modern philosophy on Pragmatism-where he borrowed from the Anglo-Saxon vision of that particular philosophical trend, extolling the importance of intuition, promptness of action, inventiveness, realism and dialectic solidarity. After his speech, he was asked by one of the members of the jury - even the president of the jury, Dr Jean Chrysostome Mondzo - to clarify what the contribution of his thesis could be to the African world. To this, the young man unexpectedly came up with a totally displaced answer. He said, very calmly: 'A people that does not know how to imitate is doomed to extinction.'
The answer was completely incongruous, because not only was it not a logical continuation of Patrick's preamble, it was neither a coherent answer to the question. The jury itself was frozen. When asked to explain himself he stated that, because the Negro-African type of species seemed incapable of following the stereotypes of the world, it was not possible to expect what any philosophy would be of any use in Africa, let alone the perspective of inventing a typically African philosophy that could work, which would be much harder than making use of any existing philosophy.
The Negro-African mind just doesn't seem to be able to make it. And this is why not only is the African Negro doomed to extinction as Patrick could foresee it in a much longer time scale, but he is equally doomed to being denied his human fullness as well as the humiliations that are subsequent to this condition, far before his total extinction. The Negro's troubles in this world are, thus, definitely not related to his colour, but to his inability to imitate, perform and compete.
I also remember David Raid, a British politician, delivering a speech that was so well picked up by the media and divulged with a great sense of pride in The Scotsman 's edition of the 22 nd of October 1997-a statement that could well have been taken for racial abuse. 'We are a forward-thinking race ,' he said, and went on, 'anything we do should paint a picture of inspiration; it should be different and challenging. Sometimes we take easy options because we do not want to take the risk of offending other people. But I think that the distinctive things that make us out today are our intellectual skills, the quality of our education, our contribution to philosophy and science and so on.'
My own conviction, in relation to such a statement, is that someone like David Raid would not be prepared to concede racial equality despite the countless racial equality legislation that swarm the British parliament. However, Mr Raid was not really intending to talk race, as far as I can see it. He did so only by accident. What he wanted to talk about-which he did, quite explicitly-was civilisation. He wanted to talk about the superiority of the white race on the basis of 'its intellectual skills, the quality of its education, its contribution to philosophy and science and so on;' which the black race-and perhaps some other races that Mr Raid might have had in mind-prove incapable to perform. And this is why Mr Raid would probably not respect them. And he is not alone. This is only a one-man representation of the whole of the white mentality. Some say it loud; some don't.
In War , Bob Marley wrote: 'Until the philosophy that holds one race superior and another inferior is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned, everywhere is war, me say war'. These words give me the impression that, because of the misleading promiscuities that have ruled over the issue of racism, Mr Marley might have been forced to believe that racism is a philosophy that might have been invented by some white folks and that needs to be discredited by another philosophy that should be invented by some black folks. In truth, it is not. Racism is not an older theoretical fabrication that can just be supplanted by a younger one. It is not like a theory of everything versus quantum mechanics. Racism was not worked out in a laboratory or in an academy of arts. Instead, it is an observable phenomenon that dynamically embraces all layers of any society in which a group of men seem to be doing better than another in some area of excellence. Because, it is, as I see it, a principle of life that 'all things superior or inferior are not so in human language unless their technical qualities are so in human existence.'
[...]
Excerpt 3 - Chapter 3 [The bogus kinship with Egyptology] - (pp.33-35):
At the end of chapter 1, I proposed the denial of the Negro's servile nature on the account of today's constant and fussy strife for his emancipation, freedom, equality, independence, integration and even integrity, because, in my view, man could just not fight against his own nature that way. On the contrary, I said, what man always fights is artificial fabrications that mostly tend to blot out his true inherent nature. And I posed, as a practical hypothesis, that perhaps there was something artificial about the Negro that had taken away his true human nature and had relegated him to the rank of something not truly human. If so, as asked, what was it?
Then, from my study of Washington's work, I came up with the conclusion that, instead of looking at the Negro's plight as resulting from his servile nature or from someone else's barbaric nature, it was more likely to be the case that he was just too weak to fight and compete. And perhaps this is the thing that is artificial about him: the fact that human existence now tends to be something more sophisticated-artificial-than natural (with all the mechanical, scientific and technological achievements that now stand as the measure of human nature). Perhaps it is the Negro's sense of natural simplicity in a sophisticated world that is turning him into something less human.
Indeed, this probability can be contended even on a purely lexical point of view. The Romans themselves, the ones who invented the notion of 'human nature ' , did not see it as something fundamentally connected to the human genus, but rather as something more related to mechanical sophistication. For example, i f we take dictionaries, we will find that the phrase 'human being' is a literal translation of the Latin phrase sere humanus which means 'to be cultivated, educated, organised. That is why its derivative noun humanitas means 'culture', 'education', 'organisation', or 'civilisation'. And, if we try to look a bit further, we will find that the word humanus is directly linked to the word cultus which means 'cultivation', 'education', 'organisation' 'refinement', 'decoration', 'sophistication'. So, when the Romans would use the phrase ingenia cultiora as referring to their own culture, what they meant was that their culture was the most sophisticated and refined compared to their neighbours ' cultures and who, for them, were barbarous for being not as refined and well organised as themselves; which implied that they were more human than their neighbours on the grounds of their high level of sophistication . This is even the reason why Roman annexations took their impetus from the famous sentence: homines a fera agrestique vita ad hunc humanum cultum civilemque deducere ; which means, 'take men from their wild and savage life and drag them into our state of civilisation and political organisation'. In fact, the Romans felt as if they had a 'duty' to educate the primitive peoples around them to help them enter 'humanity' or 'the world of sophistication'.
The O xford Dictionary of Advanced English confirms this too when it defines 'a sophisticated culture' as 'the one that has lost natural simplicity and learned the ways of the world with the latest improvements and refinements' ; which implies that those who are not improved and refined are 'out of the world' and live 'on the fringes of humanity'.
So, even when this original definition of the phrase 'human being' is not taken into account, the psychology that stands behind it remains manifest in the way in which more advanced humans look at and treat less advanced ones. And this is, in my view, where the Negro comes in.
What I mostly regret in my debate is the unfortunate twist that it ended up developing: the perception at some point of a poignant controversy. The debate seems to have left an open window to racism, probably because of its historical friction with the 'north-south divide' or the 'black-and-white divide', which bears a considerable deal of prejudice on both Euro-centrist and Afro-centrist camps. It is as if the Negro were, in my position, being bestialised, if one were to push the interpretation to the extreme. Booker Washington, in a similar position, had already been accused by Kelly Miller of practising what he named 'a cult of ridicule and belittlement' by advancing that the American Negro could not claim equal status with the American Caucasian while he could not display equal weapons to compete with him. Afro-centrist figures seem always to feel insulted when the issue is tackled beyond the boundaries of political correctness.
[...]
Excerpt 4 - Chapter 5 - [Cultural falsification and intrusive messiahship] - (pp. 68-71):
[...]
I would like to be followed with some sharp attention from here. I am not saying that the Americans, Caribbeans, Europeans or even those who call themselves Africans don't have the right to intervene in and help Black Africa in some possible way if they wish to. I am merely trying to express a socio-political reality, a 'rule of life' that, in my perception, cannot be overruled by mere good will. It is like saying that everybody is free to practise homosexuality, but the probability of building a family in a natural way in a homosexual regime-that is to say, have children who would have a father and a mother and get the human species continued and preserved-is nil. And the reason for this is quite simple: nature, cosmic impulse, creative energy, primeval thought, God-whatever you wish to call it-did not programme life to work like that. This is a technical position that does not have anything to do with the passionate promiscuities that mark this subject in the mainstream rostrums of our world's dogmatic conditions and political correctness.
It is, therefore, not the freedom of doing things the way one feels like that is problematic here. The problem rather resides in the probability of arriving at a certain end while doing things in a certain way. I am myself a very free spirit. I stick to no system of thinking or acting. My viewpoints-if I have any viewpoints at all-are not the product of my background education. I would not even dare say that I have any background education at all. I even repress and reject my personal experiences when I am to go about discussing any subject. Because any personal connection or sympathy that one can establish with any phenomenon is always damaging to a certain extent, however little, to the prospect of technical objectivity. I always have to associate my experiences, if I have any, with those of other people in order to establish their validity. I cannot even be a gentleman, because gentlemanly obligations are some of these masters that we are ordered to serve outside any technical justification. We just follow them blindly. For example, one of the things that I profoundly regret today is my past attempts to follow some political movements in a world in which subscription to a political tendency is the equivalent of engaging oneself to please someone rather than to stand for some principle. I cannot follow politicians. I even have enormous trouble settling down in a relationship because I cannot abide by what some woman would consider to be the ideal way to maintain a relationship.
However, this sort of unsettling personality of mine has a principle. Its principle is 'Technicality'. My own conviction is that 'human existence is a machine, like any other machine, with its own technical wheel-work. Therefore, I shall not say nor do anything unless there is any technical justification for it.' So, as a human being in good working order-I suppose this is what I am-, I have to stick to a technical reason in everything I say or do. I really cannot do something, however virtuous it might seem to be, as long as there does not seem to be there any technical justification for it. Even to pursue my existence as a living being, I do need a technical justification for it. I do not think that I would be wasting my energy fighting to remain alive if I could not justify any technical necessity for it: the very fact that I am the only one who can do certain things in this world is not the least-if there understandably would be there anything else to justify my necessity to exist that would be less futile than there being there no one else to transmit my genes on to future paradises.
It is true that, despite this prominently technical personality of mine, I am not just a special machine performing special operations. I remain a social being, though. For example, I have friends-even if I have to recognise that there is a big difference between what I call friendship and what most people would consider to be so. Friendship, for me, is passion. It is the passion of sharing something with someone who is passionate about it too. This is why my friendship is compartmental. If I get on with someone within the framework of beer drinking, he will be my friend only as far as beer drinking is concerned. I would not try to convince him that he should also come to church with me as long as there would not be any technical justification for such a suggestion. And this is true for any friendship that I may be or have been entertaining with whoever it may be or have been. I don't take anyone anywhere, and I don't do anything with anyone. For example, I have had a very good friend in Sussex for many years, with whom I play scrabble at least once a week. I don't do anything else with him apart from plying scrabble. If I try to watch Newsnight with him, he will not be as enthusiastic as I am about the genius of Jeremy Paxman in catching out politicians in their witless contradictions. So, this is something, as many other things, that I cannot share with him with passion, although we are both excited in almost equal proportions about scrabble.
It is in this same sort of way, too, that I am a good friend of the Western world-or shall I say the civilised world, in general. I have many French, English, Spanish, American, Chinese and Russian friends, which whom I share different practical things with a lot of passion; humane things at times-which is quite rare, because civilised people are more human than humane. I admire and envy their exceptional ability to achieve the impossible, to establish superiority, to subdue the world; but most of all, their degree of intelligence and great will, their uncanny knack for improvement.
Yet, I would not share with any of these people the Black African question in terms of improvement, because there is not technical justification for some distant advocates from the West or from the East to succeed in repairing the Negro-African world on the grounds of some vague, inconsistent connection. The Americans may be very clever people, but they remain ignorant as far as the understanding of the Negro-African world is concerned-let alone the very sensitive question of setting out appropriate means to improve it.
[...]
Excerpt 5 - Chapter 7 - [ African Socio-fictions and Western myths] - (pp. 97-99):
Many Africans intellectuals who have probably been living in the bubble of colonial mentality have been very keen on noting the limitations of my approach to the problem of Black Africa. But this is, in my perception, only the result of the false perceptions that they have been brought up to ingurgitate about Western political structures that they are smartly forced to see as comparable to African structures.
Simon Ekoga is the character that opened that window to my debate, noting that even if one only clung to culture and language to define what I would consider to be true identifiable nations and civilisations, one could certainly not maintain that territorial multiculturalism or 'multilingualism' would be a technical obstacle for a country's affirmation if affirmative countries such as France are so multicultural. Mr Ekoga's point was an interesting one insofar as it did raise a practical contradiction. I did myself consider this contradiction at some point of my own reflections until I tried to look a bit deeper into the situation and found that the contradiction did, actually, not exist. Because, to say that France is a multicultural country in a similar stance to Black African countries is to blindly refuse to take into account its history.
Once again, I hate mentioning the word 'history' every time it comes to dealing with historical facts, because I am, in this case, likely to be expected to recount history, which I do not do. Instead, I explain history. I explore historical concepts; their causality and their effects: the social, political and psychological rationale behind them as well as the mechanisms that govern their activation and their occurrence. To some people, maintaining that France is not a multicultural country would probably be like saying that the Holocaust never happened, whereas it did, indeed; which makes such a position either outrageous or absurd.
However, there is a big difference between denying the occurrence of an event that did actually occur and rebuffing a certain mentality or psychology that, for some reason, may lead people to perceive the occurrence of an event the way the event itself did actually not occur. It is, therefore, more about seeking to reach a better understanding of an event than a matter of admitting or denying it altogether.
The problem with advancing that France is not a multicultural country is more or less the same. It is not about seeking to deny the existence of a bluntly observable phenomenon, but rather more about trying to rectify the perception of a phenomenon by those who, for some reason, may have been led to perceive the phenomenon the way the phenomenon itself is actually not. For example, if we take the existence of 'women' as a human phenomenon, we will see that the mentality and psychology of some societies do perceive women as mere child-bearing machines. Yet, it cannot be more asserted that this is what the woman phenomenon is really all about than it would be to rather see it as good graphic material for the advertisement industry in some other societies. In the meantime, the true original causality that resulted in the existence of the woman phenomenon might have been activated by completely different motivations that our own societal perceptions of women may just be losing sight of. So, what I would do in this case would be to look into the cosmic technicalities-if I can-in order to find the profound motives for women to be caused to exist, irrespective of some dogmatic and lucrative perceptions that may have been developed about women in different societies.
It is pretty much the same thing that I do when I explore history. I put aside propaganda and dogma, and I turn to historical mechanics . This is why when I say that France is not a multicultural country in the same stance as Black African countries, as some people may have been led to see it, what I intend to do is to rectify a perception that is totally wrong, not because I just want it to sound wrong, but because that perception doesn't fit in the actual historical mechanics of the birth and the formation of France as a country.
First of all, France was formed out of an internal cultural endeavour whereas Black African countries-whichever one you think of-were invented out of external economic urges. This statement may not be of any significance to you as far as the clarification of my point is concerned. But you are going to see how significant it may be quite soon.
Take a Black African country. Any one you want; although I am forced to give myself the authority to choose the one I want in your place at this point in time; firstly because I can't wait for you to choose, otherwise I would have to stop writing, publish the book halfway, and then complete it once I get the reader's feedback; which is not practical. Secondly, I am not sure that my unilateral choice will affect the objectivity of my argument insofar as I have already shown, in the preceding chapter, that all Black African countries are exactly the same, in terms of structure and functioning. And because my argument here concerns structural and functional technicalities, the choice of whichever country I may go for will in no possible way alter the relevance or the intensity of my argument.
So, let us take, say, Gabon-versus France. [...]
Please click here to get your copy of the book, or here to recommend this page to a friend.
What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology - What is Wrong with Black People? - How Post-slave Psychology and Afrocenticity are joining with Colonialism to undermine Black Africa's Cultural Integrity - New books online, black history, African history, African cultures and languages, great philosophers, black identity, African civilisation, new vision for African, African intellectuals, philosophy movements, black heritage, black excellence, black authors and writers, African Renaissance, Afrocentrism, political thinking, development, racism, supremacism, globalisation, Egyptology -
|
|
|
|
|
| i |
Interactive Links |
|
|
|
|
|
| i |
|
|
|
|
| i |
Help and Services |
|
|
|
| i |
Inspiring Thinkers |
|
|
|
|
|
| i |
|
|
